Questions on the nature of time are at the core of many challenging philosophical debates. This is no surprise, given the all but ubiquitous presence of temporal elements in most matters. Indeed, almost any aspect of reality seems to be imbued with dynamic traits – from the formation of galaxies, through chemical and subatomic interactions, to the evolution of life. Our ordinary experience, too, is attuned to this world of change and movement, as is reflected by the centrality of temporal elements in the way our perceptual systems work, and in the way thought and natural languages are structured. Nonetheless, different disciplines embrace widely different ways of approaching time, and although most philosophical problems about the nature of time are intertwined with each other, they often arise within distinct areas, such as metaphysics, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of physics. Outside philosophy, too, disciplines such as psychology, computer science, sociology, history and economics, to name but a few, have engaged in discussions that are relevant for our understanding of time. Although this diversity is a positive aspect of the topic’s interdisciplinary nature, its potential benefits are impaired by a lack of successful communication between the frameworks. The central idea of TEMPFRAME is to work out the theoretical foundation of a common ground that can be exploited to facilitate mutual interactions between different disciplines. The core aim is to collect, in a systematic way, various results that are useful for our understanding of time, organising them into philosophical theories that, in turn, can be used by scholars in disciplines outside philosophy.